NE Lincs Cycle Superhighways proposal

CS LondonLondon mayor Boris Johnson and the DfT have made the term cycling superhighways one that we are familiar with. This is a proposal to have a network of genuine cycle superhighways in NE Lincs, and to ensure they actually do fit the description by being designed and built to top quality standards.

CS2These should not be shared pavements the like of which we see on the Humberston/Healing Pedalways & along part of Scartho Rd, where the limited space is shared with pedestrians and the paths always give way to side streets. On many of the routes proposed below there’s plenty of space to create physically separated, high quality cycle lanes/paths on each side of the road in addition to the pavements. Where there is less space the cycleway should still be separated from motor traffic but be a bi-directional path on just one side of the road.

At present there is clearly no grand plan for cycling although things are improving incrementally. There are a few good quality cycle paths (I’ve featured these here in a previous post), but mainly all we have in NE Lincs is just a hotch-potch of isolated stretches of poor quality painted-on lanes. These do nothing to encourage cycling because they are not safe or pleasant to use.

cs33These proposed five cycle superhighways provide an essential skeleton of major routes around which further minor link routes could be developed as time goes by. If these five routes were established in the way described, they would provide an interconnected, safe and pleasant way to cycle between the main residential areas, the town centres, the main train stations, the main shopping areas/stores and the main areas of employment and education.

This would enable and encourage many more people to use cycling as a means of everyday transport. This not only helps those cycling become healthier by getting daily moderate exercise, but also benefits everyone else by reducing traffic congestion, air pollution and noise pollution, and so makes the whole area a better place to live.

So here are my suggestions for the NE Lincs Cycling Superhighways:

  • CS1 Pleasure Island to the oil refineries (CS1W) and HST (CS1N)
  • CS2 Morrisons to Isaacs Hill
  • CS3 Waltham roundabout to the A180 (CS3W) and Cleethorpes Rd (CS3E)
  • CS4 Grimsby train station to Immingham
  • CS5 Waltham roundabout to Cleethorpes promenade

Of course, the present cycling budget comes nowhere near covering such a proposal. The funding for these five Cycle Superhighways should be provided from the wider transport budget and central government. If £6m can be found for the recent ”green” development in Grimsby town centre, which I’m not alone in thinking provides very little benefit (many would say it has been a complete waste of money), then the funding for such a network of top quality cycle infrastructure, with all its attendant benefits, can and surely should be provided.

The routes in detail:

CS1: From Pleasure Island in Cleethorpes all along Kings Rd to Cleethorpes Leisure Centre, then along the prom to Cleethorpes train station, through the station onto Station Rd then turning left onto Princes Rd to the bottom of Isaacs Hill in Cleethorpes. Turn right all along Grimsby Rd & Cleethorpes Rd to Riby Sq. Take the road between the flyover and the Telegraph offices (the other direction would be routed under the flyover). Along this road a cycle bridge gently rises to cross the railway line and comes down before the turning for King Edward St. Continuing along Cleethorpe Rd by The Landings, crossing Victoria St and continuing alongside the A180 on the Westward (out of town) side. Once level with Charlton St another cycle bridge gently rises to cross the A180 and comes down at the top of Moody Lane. Continuing along the full length of Moody Lane, a new connecting stretch of cyclepath apx 200m long, with a bridge over the beck, connects with Hobson Way. (I’ve previously written about this here). Along Hobson Way, Laporte Rd (passing Immingham Docks eastgate), then left along Queens Rd, Kings Rd, to the very end of Manby Rd. The route then spurs in two directions:

  • CS1 West: west along Humber Rd (A160) to the lights at the Jet garage opposite the refinery
  • CS1 North: north along Rosper Rd as far as HST on Clough Rd. (This last section from Immingham to Killingholme would require agreement between both NE Linc Council and North Linconshire Council.)

CS2: All the way from alongside Morrisons, the full length of Laceby Rd, across Nunns Corner, then along Weelsby Rd, Clee Rd right through to Isaacs Hill roundabout, where it connects with CS1.

CS3: From Waltham roundabout all along Waltham Rd, Scartho Rd (removing a lane of traffic where necessary to create space for a bi-directional cycleway), around Nunns Corner (crossing CS2) onto Bargate (I’ve written about Bargate in an earlier post here). At the junction with Brighowgate CS3 forks into two:

  • CS3 East: along Brighowgate to Grimsby town station, out onto Osborne St, East St past the Town Hall, right onto Pasture St, left onto East Robinson St, left onto Holles St, right onto Ellis Way, over Hainton Sq onto Eleanor St, left onto Convamore Rd then Victor St connecting with CS1 at Cleethorpes Rd.
  • CS3 West: continuing along Bargate, Cartergate, left onto Lord St, right onto Anderson St, left along the river, right onto Earl St, along Freshney Drve, Yarborough Drive, Freshney Drive, left onto Corporation Rd, right onto Charlton St, connecting with CS1 at the cycle bridge over the A180.

CS4: From Grimsby train station through St James Square, Chantry Lane, Littlefield Lane, Cromwell Rd, Yarborough Rd, then along the route of the Healing Pedalway through to Healing on Great Coates Rd, then extending beyond Healing on Stallingborough Rd through to Stallingborough and on to Immingham. Along Pelham Rd to connect to CS1 at Manby Rd.

CS5: From Waltham roundabout along Station Rd past Toll Bar school, left along Louth Rd, along Peaks Parkway, Hewitt’s Ave, Taylors Ave and Queens Parade to connect with CS1.

Advertisements

Eleanor Street needs more than 20mph signs

The new 20mph signs on Eleanor St, as seen from Hainton Square.

The new 20mph signs on Eleanor St, as seen from Hainton Square.

Making Eleanor St a 20mph limit is a small step in the right direction, but without cameras & other improvements it’s something of a waste of time. Virtually no-one is respecting the new speed limit. I doubt many drivers have even seen the signs.

However, the speed of traffic there is not the only problem. Firstly, there’s no room for cyclists heading away from the town centre. Traffic squeezes past you dangerously close. And secondly, heading into the town centre is dangerous becausealthough there is a painted-on lane it’s not physically separated from the oncoming traffic. Additionally, the road surface is rough and uncomfortable for cycling on.

So, to make it a cycling-friendly route make it one lane of traffic with two physically segregated cycle lanes either side, surfaced with smooth asphalt. Traffic approaching Hainton Square on Ellis Way (arriving from Asda/town centre) does so in two lanes. Make the left hand lane a left turn for Freeman St or straight on into Eleanor St. Make the right hand lane a right turn only into Hainton Ave. This leaves just the one lane for motor traffic on Eleanor St.

By then adding a speed camera on Eleanor St the new 20mph limit would be enforced, making it a safe route for cyclists. This is a major route to & from the town centre for cyclists so please make it safe to cycle on. Just sticking 20mph signs up is not a solution!

IMG_20141124_115117

2nd class citizens on 3rd world cycling infrastructure

Why is it cyclists are still 2nd class citizens on 3rd world cycling infrastructure? It’s simply not good enough that there’s no space for cycling on virtually all the roads in NE Lincolnshire. Today I was cycling in the (very thin) painted-on lane at Fryston Corner, approaching the college on Weelsby Rd, when a guy in a silver Mondeo, registration H7 G – –  (I don’t recall the full regn) almost knocked me off my bike. This was in full daylight, around lunchtime, & I was in the cycle lane. It was such a close shave I knocked on his window at the traffic lights to tell him he nearly knocked me off and to leave space for cyclists. All I got in return was a V-sign, a tirade of expletives and  “you don’t pay road tax”!

Actually Mr foul-mouthed Mondeo, I do pay road tax but that’s not the point. There’s space for people walking – it’s called a pavement. They don’t pay road tax but they have a space to be in. People riding a bike do not have a space to be in. We have to share the road with vehicles that, driven by ignorant or careless drivers, pose a genuine threat to our safety and even our lives.

The painted on lanes that the council have provided for people riding bikes are simply NOT GOOD ENOUGH! It’s not good enough to expect drivers to respect cyclists because as anyone who has cycled on our roads will tell you, they don’t! When you’re driving your car you’re insulated from the outside world and oblivious to the danger cyclists face. Putting up signs asking drivers to respect cycle lanes, as NE Lincs council has done recently, is frankly laughable. I understand it’s an attempt to improve things for cyclists by a transport department of the council with no budget to do a proper job, but it is completely futile. I doubt if most drivers have even seen these signs along Clee Rd and Weelsby Rd.

A sign asking drivers to respect the cycle lanes.

A sign asking drivers to respect the cycle lanes. Obviously, it’s not having the desired effect!

I doubt many if any drivers have even seen these signs. Signage is not the answer - good design is.

I doubt many if any drivers have even seen these wholly ineffectual signs. Signage is not the answer – good design is. There’s plenty of space here to create a segregated cycle lane that provides a safe cycle space.

The answer is proper action by the council to allocate funds to create separated cycle lanes, so that there is a safe space for cycling. Nothing else will do. It doesn’t have to cost a fortune or take decades to do. Look at what has been achieved in New York over the last 5 years with good design and a proactive approach. Why is NE Lincs council so blind to the safety of cyclists on it’s roads? That’s a question I’d really like an answer to!

Take a look at this solution from New York….

Not bad.

Not bad. Photo from Business Insider

or this from Bogota….

Photo from citiesforpeople.net

Not bad at all! Photo from citiesforpeople.net

and this example of cycling infrastructure in The Netherlands: (the best!)

Copenhagen updates

Copenhagen has been doing a lot to accommodate and encourage cycling recently, and here’s another great Streetfilms video showing that. The film features some of the Copenhagenize team proudly demonstrating some of the new features and developments, including the Snake bridge and the Green Wave. Brilliant! If you love cycling, you’ll want to visit Copenhagen!

 

 

Painted lines are not infrastructure

Excerpts from Jon Snows comments to the Transport Select Committee in 2012.

Jon Snow presents Space For Cycling

Jon Snow, the news presenter and CTC president, in an excellent short video focusing on the space needed to accomodate everyday cycling.

Dutch cycling city nominees 2014: Enschede

This is the third in a series of articles on Bicycle Dutch, looking at this years contenders for Cycling City 2014, and featuring Enschede, in the east of the country.

You can read the full article here.

More on the Bike Tube proposal

It’s important to bear in mind this proposal is designed for enabling the majority of people in NE Lincs to use a bike instead of a car for everyday local transport, as well as commuting to the main industrial areas along the Humber bank.

This means literally thousands of people cycling every day! The proposal isn’t to accommodate present levels of cycling. As discussed in the earlier Vision posts, people don’t cycle at present because it’s perceived as being unsafe, uncomfortable and inconvenient. By making it safe, comfortable and convenient, as well as low-cost, healthy and enjoyable, I believe literally thousands of people would cycle instead of drive. The aim of this proposal is to get the majority of people making the majority of their local journeys by bike instead of car.

The Tube could enter into Freshney Place parking area directly. Image from velo-city.ca

The Tube could enter into Freshney Place parking area directly. Image from velo-city.ca

In the proposal, the centre of Grimsby the section has five junctions: Welholme, Grimsby train station, Cromwell Road, Ellis Way and Freshney Place. The junction at Freshney Place is unique in that it runs into the building itself at the first (or second) floor level. There would be no need for entry/exit ramps. That entire floor would be given over to cycle parking instead of car parking. The number of bikes that could be parked there would be in the region of 25 times the number of cars that presently park on that floor (ten bikes fit in one car space, which would be double stacked, plus extra space for bikes due to less space taken by access space).

The whole idea of the Bike Tube is to make it safe, comfortable and convenient for people who currently wouldn’t consider cycling to use bikes for their everyday transport. That’s the majority of people living in NE Lincs! The prospect of being able to cycle straight into the shopping centre directly from the Bike Tube increases the convenience and practicality of the scheme to such people. This would also provide secure bike parking for other users, not just shoppers, those coming into town to work, for instance. The present parking facility at the Cycle Hub would be wholly insufficient hence the parking in Freshney Place, but the Cycle Hub at the train station could be expanded to provide increased facilities to the town centre south area.

Likewise there would be junctions at each of the main superstores, with the exception of Sainsbury’s (unless the Tube could be routed across Corporation Rd Bridge with a junction at Sainsbury’s then on to Freshney Place, instead of directly from Asda to Freshney Place).

Another aspect of the Tube concerns the dock areas in Grimsby and Immingham. Because the Tube is enclosed and secure, there is no security issue for the dock operators as people can only enter or exit at the junctions, as on a normal motorway. Hence, the Tube could be routed through dock areas (with all the necessary permissions and agreements, of course) with no security issues. The route which crosses the lock at Lock Hill in Grimsby would need to be sufficiently high as to ensure the passage of all vessels through the lock. At Immingham Dock, if the Tube is routed through the dock and featured a junction there (I believe there should be access there as it is an area of major employment), there could be a new security gate at this junction to deal entirely with cyclists arriving/leaving the dock.

Nomenclature and Junctions

A map of the proposed Bike Tube network in Grimsby and Cleethorpes.

A map of the proposed Bike Tube network in Grimsby and Cleethorpes.

If we were to number the Tube sections following the motorway numbering convention, then we could number the Grimsby/Cleethorpes area as follows:

T1: Meridian Point to Europarc (and on to Humber Sea Terminal (HST), at Killingholme)

T2: Europarc to Waltham

T3: Waltham to Meridian Point

T4: New Waltham to Riby Square

T5: Ellis Way to Grimsby Auditorium

T6: Pyewipe to Wybers Wood

T7: Blundell Park to Scartho

T8: Laceby Acres to Laceby

List of proposed junctions by Tube section, as indicated on the map:

T1: Meridian Point, Cleethorpes Leisure Centre, Seaview St, Cleethorpes Train Station, Blundell Park, New Clee, Riby Square, Moody Lane, Pyewipe, Woad Lane, Europarc.

T2: Europarc, Great Coates, Aylesby park, Wybers Wood, Laceby Acres (Morrisons), Bradley, Scartho Top, Springfield, Waltham.

T3: Waltham, Toll Bar, New Waltham, Humberston (Tesco), Country Park, Meridian Point.

T4: New Waltham, Peaks Parkway (YMCA), Welholme, Ellis Way (Asda), Riby Square.

T5: Ellis Way (Asda), Freshney Place (north) / Grimsby Train Station (south), Cromwell Rd, Market Hotel Roundabout, Auditorium.

T6: Pyewipe, Gilbey Rd, Auditorium, Little Coates, Wybers Wood.

T7: Blundell Park, Queen mary Ave, Runswick Rd (Ploggers), Weelsby Rd (behind Beverley Cres, not at St Andrews Hospice as shown on the map), Peaks Parkway (YMCA), Scartho.

T8: Laceby Acres (Morrisons), Laceby.

Vision: a revolution in urban transport

I concluded the last post in this series by saying:

As things stand, massive amounts of money have been allocated to the budget for implementing the vision for our roads over the years. But what if, having seen the huge benefits cycling brings, a large part of the transport budget was devoted to implementing the new vision of healthy, sustainable urban transport? What if, instead of integrating the car into all the planning decisions, it was the bicycle that featured in the centre of the planning decisions? And by doing so, as well as the existing cycling benefits of health, wealth and environmental goodness, we could add safety, comfort and convenience?

The Dutch have demonstrated how to integrate cycling into existing road infrastructure, and by consistently designing this into their road plans, they have created a very desirable network of relatively safe cycleways. I say relatively, because, although he Netherlands is without doubt the safest country in the world to be a cyclist, I was surprised to read the following statistics on cycling accidents and deaths in the Netherlands:

In 2009, there were 185 cyclists killed on Dutch roads. In 2010, that number was 162 killed and in 2011 there were 200 cyclists killed.

These figures surprised me, I expected them to be lower, given the excellent cycling infrastructure in The Netherlands. This reminded me of a BBC documentary I saw in the mid 1990’s about the Russian Federation following the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of economic crisis and difficult transition. The question was though, a transition to what exactly? One young profession Russian was interviewed on the streets of Moscow and his comments struck me. He said that Russia had left the Communist days behind, and many in the country were looking to become like the West. But he said, if Russia aimed at where the West was then, by the time Russia had arrived at that point, the West would have moved on and Russia would still be behind. Rather than imitate the West as it was then, he suggested why not look to the direction the West was heading in and aim there instead.

This was an insightful comment and we can apply it to our cycling vision for the future. What the Netherlands has today has taken decades of consistent planning and funding, and we are not going to be able to replicate it here in the UK overnight. So, instead of copying where the Netherlands is now, why not look beyond that and plan for the future, something better than exists today?

What the Netherlands has done is demonstrate how to incorporate cycling into everyday life, sharing the road space with other traffic by building separated cycleways. However, I believe this is only part of the “ideal”. Cycling on these cycleways is still unpleasant when the rain is pouring down and the wind howling in your face. And the statistics show people are still being killed whilst cycling in the Netherlands.  So, as good as it is there, and it is the best in the world at present, it’s still far from perfect.

I believe there is a way to build both on the Dutch shoulders, so to speak, and to incorporate the thinking of architects like Chris Hardwicke and Steven Fleming, to create something that is truly a step into the future, a giant stride forward instead of nibbling around the edges of minor infrastructural improvements.

Taking all these thoughts and factors into account, what then is the way forward? By taking the ideas of Chris Hardwicke in Toronto and developing them further, I propose a completely new and radical approach that incorporates all the existing cycling benefits of health, wealth and environmental goodness, and combines them with safety, comfort and convenience. A network of urban “motorways” for cycling! This vision is for a low-tech urban mass transit system, far more cost-effective, efficient and environmentally friendly than the alternative of ever increasing levels of motor vehicle use. It is a system of enclosed, one-directional back-draughted tubes, elevated above existing roads and rail lines, forming a perfect environment for urban cycling, fully protected from the weather. We could call it the Bike Tube!

Velo-City proposal in Toronto. In NE Lincs, this would be 3m wide enclosed, uni-directional tubes, with a constant back wind enabling comfortable and safe urban cycling .

Velo-City proposal in Toronto. In NE Lincs, this would be pairs of enclosed, uni-directional tubes, with a constant back wind enabling comfortable and safe urban cycling. Image from velo-city.ca

_________

 Imagine the scene: It’s a cold, wet and windy Monday morning, and you’re about to leave for work. You put on your coat, hat and gloves, and cycle the short distance from your home (for example, on Middlethorpe Road), along the separated cycleway to the nearest junction of the Bike Tube at Humberston, near Tesco’s. Your keyless-entry fob in your pocket opens the automated gate and you proceed up the entry ramp, assisted by the moving elevator up to the Tube itself. As you enter, you’re suddenly in a different world.

Riding along in a 3-4m wide transparent tube, you’re protected from the wintry conditions outside. Instead of riding into a head wind, you’re now riding along comfortably at 15-20 mph because of the continuous back wind flowing throughout the length of the Tube. It’s not at all cold in the Tube, just a pleasant ambient temperature, perfect for cycling. There are no motorised vehicles here, no traffic lights and no pedestrians, just cyclists, hundreds of them, all moving comfortably, safely and quickly around the network to their destinations. Each of the various junctions you pass, with their ramps down to the streets below, are signed and laned off, and other cyclists move into those lanes to  leave the Tube at those junctions, just like on a motorway for cars.

Many exit in the centre of town at the train station, others have branched off to head for the major indoor junction on the first floor at Freshney Place, but you carry on. You’ve still got another 15 minutes until you reach your junction at Immingham Docks, but it’s no problem. Far from it – you’re comfortable and enjoying the view as you ease along the elevated Tube, the rain pounding against the Tube while you serenely cycle above the train line out of town before cutting through the industrial areas and on up to your exit junction, just half a mile from your place of work.

_________

OK, it’s just a scenario, but it’s trying to paint a picture of what it could be like. The Bike Tube is a network of elevated tubes, one in each direction, with a flow of air throughout the length of the Tube in the direction of travel. This provides a perfect environment for cycling even long distances. Each terminus of each tube would have a fan generating the back-draft, and this could be supplemented by smaller thruster fans along the route. The ceiling of each tube could incorporate solar panels to generate all the power required during daylight hours, with renewable energy used during the hours of darkness. During darkness, sensors detect the presence of cyclists and ensure each forward segment is lit for their passage through that section, thus saving power.

The Bike Tube has a small ground footprint (the support column) and features two "carriageways" of tubes, one in each direction, just as in a motorway for cars. The NE Lincs Bike Tube would incorporate solar panels along the ceiling of each tube, and could be screened when passing through sensitive areas by tall trees such as Poplars.

The Bike Tube has a small ground footprint (the support column) and features two “carriageways” of tubes, one in each direction, just as in a motorway for cars. The NE Lincs Bike Tube would incorporate solar panels along the ceiling of each tube, and could be screened when passing through sensitive areas by tall trees such as Poplars. Image from Velo-City.ca

Such a network of Bike Tubes would elevate cycling, with all its inherent benefits, to the level of use that we see cars have today – a stunning urban transport revolution. At the junctions of the Tube, there would be a connected network of Dutch-style (ie, separated from the road) cycleways, including an exit/entrance cycle roundabout (as with motorways today), so that the Tube is integrated within the overall network, much as motorways are connected to urban roads. It’s exactly the same principle, only this time for bikes!

The main routes for the Tube in NE Lincs would initially be built over existing rail lines and along Peakes Parkway (previously a rail line), with additional routes added to complete the network. Main termini would be at Waltham and Meridian Point in Cleethorpes in the south, with a spur from Peakes Parkway to Scartho and a longer spur from Laceby Acres (Morrison’s) to Laceby. Nowhere within the Grimsby/Cleethorpes area would be more than a mile from a Bike Tube junction.

A map of the proposed Bike Tube network in Grimsby and Cleethorpes.

A map of the proposed Bike Tube network in Grimsby and Cleethorpes. (click to enlarge)

The Bike Tube would continue along the Humber bank from Europarc, serving the main industrial areas there, spurring off to connect Stallingborough, then continuing onwards to Immingham Dock, Immingham town and on to the oil refineries and northwards to HST and, very importantly, the huge forthcoming Able UK development. It will be massively important to be able to accommodate the large numbers of people commuting to this area in an environmentally friendly way. The Bike Tube would realistically enable mass commuting to these areas from Grimsby, Cleethorpes and Immingham by bicycle.

The running costs could be covered, at least in part, by an annual charge, for instance, of £30 for access to the Tube network. Initial development and funding would of course be major issues, but given the huge potential ongoing benefits such an innovative solution would provide (improved health for all cycling instead of driving, reductions in road maintenance costs due to reduced volumes of motor traffic, increased tourist interest in the area, etc) such costs (which could partly be borne by central Government and private industry) would surely be more than justified in the long term. The Bike Tube footprint on the ground would be minimal (just the support columns and entry/exit ramps), and where it passes by housing (kept to an absolute minimum) or other sensitive areas, such as close to the cemetery, it could be screened by planting tall trees such as Poplars.

Of course, this would be a radical development and no doubt would be controversial. I believe its significance is on a par with the development of the railway back in the 1800’s. However, as I described in earlier parts of this series, we need a radical rethinking of urban transportation. This solution is a sustainable, clean, green, quiet, low cost, health-inducing form of mass urban transit.

The Bike Tube network would be a landmark structure, a tourist attraction for the area. It also would be an innovative solution to the various aspects of urban transport – environmental, noise pollution, petrol/diesel fume pollution, and congestion on the roads. By making it practical and convenient for people to leave the car at home and go by bike, the roads themselves would be quieter with fewer cars, and subsequently fewer traffic accidents. It represents a solution that I believe would take us forward as a society.

Transport Planners please watch this

A picture is worth a thousand words, and this short video absolutely shows why we need better cycling provision. I really hope the transport planners do indeed watch this. If the Government and our local councils are really interested in getting more people cycling (and the levels of obesity and poor general public health, costs of fuel and polution, levels of traffic gridlock etc etc, clearly demonstrate we certainly need more people cycling), then we quite clearly won’t achieve this with roads that are unsafe for cyclists. And most roads in NE Lincs are unsafe for cyclists!

%d bloggers like this: